What happens if municipal bonds default

However, the underlying price of a particular bond will fluctuate in the secondary market due to market conditions. Changes in interest rates and interest rate expectations are generally the primary factors involved in municipal bond secondary market prices. When interest rates fall, newly issued bonds will pay a lower yield than existing issues, which makes the older bonds more attractive.

Investors who want the higher yield may be willing to pay more to get it. Likewise, if interest rates rise, newly issued bonds will pay a higher yield than existing issues.

Investors who buy the older issues are likely to do so only if they get them at a discount. If you buy a bond and hold it until maturity, market risk is not a factor because your principal investment will be returned in full at maturity. Should you choose to sell prior to the maturity date, your gain or loss will be dictated by market conditions, and the appropriate tax consequences for capital gains or losses will apply.

The most basic strategy for investing in municipal bonds is to purchase a bond with an attractive interest rate, or yield, and hold the bond until it matures. The next level of sophistication involves the creation of a municipal bond ladder.

A ladder consists of a series of bonds, each with a different interest rate and maturity date. As each rung on the ladder matures, the principal is reinvested into a new bond. Both of these strategies are categorized as passive strategies because the bonds are bought and held until maturity. Investors seeking to generate both income and capital appreciation from their bond portfolio may choose an active portfolio management approach, whereby bonds are bought and sold instead of held to maturity.

This approach seeks to generate income from yields and capital gains from selling at a premium. Stability is a relative term in the municipal bond market. Municipal bonds tend to be safer than many other types of investments, but they are less safe than U.

Treasury bonds. You can also trade in multiple kinds of municipal bonds, such as assessment bonds, revenue bonds, or general obligation bonds. The issuer of the bond also matters; bonds issued from municipal authorities in a city with strong financials would be considered more stable than those from a city whose credit rating has been downgraded or has recently filed for bankruptcy.

Plenty of investors make an understandable mistake during tough or uncertain times and develop tunnel vision about stability and safety. In their flight from risk, however, they fail to consider how an investment fits into their financial plans. Municipal bonds can be a tax haven, often generating higher returns than Treasuries. They can still lose to inflation and tie up large sums of money for much longer than a recession typically lasts.

Internal Revenue Service. Accessed July 30, Moody's Investors Service. Securities and Exchange Commission. Municipal Bonds. Corporate Bonds. Download link sent. Start investing now or. Start Investing Now. Was this article helpful? Have a query? ITR Resources. Mutual Fund Resources. Terms Privacy Legal. Test your knowledge on common investing terms and strategies and current investing topics.

Learn about investing risks in certain companies that provide exposure to China-based businesses. Are you prepared for your financial future?

Use this checklist to get started. Please enter some keywords to search. Municipal Bonds. What are municipal bonds? The two most common types of municipal bonds are the following: General obligation bonds are issued by states, cities or counties and not secured by any assets.

Where can investors find information about municipal bonds? What are some of the risks of investing in municipal bonds? Investors in municipal bonds face a number of risks, specifically including: Call risk. In addition to the risks, what other factors should you consider when investing in municipal bonds?

Featured Content. The Fitch study of municipal debt defaults was followed by a revision of its rating criteria for many sectors of public finance. The study concluded that management practices were more important for predicting credit performance than had been thought in the past. The three most important management practices identified that led to stronger credit and lower defaults were: Superior disclosure Maintaining rainy day funds or operating reserves Implementing debt affordability reviews and policies.

The city also pledged to contribute parking meter revenues for the operation and maintenance of the garage. A contract between the developer of the mall and Nordstrom, the mall's major tenant, allowed the retailer to choose the garage operator, set parking rates and approve any changes to the contract. The Foundation defaulted on its debt payment after revenues from the garage fell short of projections. Bondholders argued that the city had pledged to back the revenue bonds with parking meter revenues.

But the city reasoned that it could not honor its pledge to loan money to the authority since it was improbable that it would be repaid and thus would be illegal under the city's investment guidelines.

The bonds went into technical default in and monetary default in , resulting in a downgrade of the city's bond rating. In Moody's downgraded the city's unlimited tax and general-obligation bonds from A1 to A2, the city's limited tax general obligation bonds from A2 to A3, and the city's water and sewer revenue bonds from A1 to A3.

Institutional and retail investors sued the city, the developer of the garage and the underwriting team. Koegen, saying that that the law firm should become liable if the city became liable. Perkins Coie terminated its relationship with the city as outside bond counsel in and closed its Spokane office in In mid-April , Spokane's chief financial officer announced that the city would arrange for interim financing to settle the lawsuit by selling six-month bond anticipation notes.

The city's purchase of the garage from the Foundation was deemed taxable by the Internal Revenue Service in a preliminary ruling in That ruling is still being negotiated because the Foundation disputed the agency's findings.

A lawyer representing institutional investors said that the city would indemnify bondholders if the IRS ruling held. Walker Parking Consultants, Inc.

In mid-April, the presiding judge postponed the scheduled trial in federal court after bondholders agreed to settle with the city, arguing that the case would possibly never go to trial if the city settled with all the parties involved. If the case does go to trial, the city would become the litigant against any remaining defendants.

In , the Cicero Local Development Corp. The town of Cicero signed a year lease with the Corporation and also backed its general obligation debt and underlying mortgage. But the Facility failed to generate adequate revenues to cover debt service payments.

Bank of New York, the trustee, made debt service payments by drawing on reserves, which led to a technical default by the Corporation in August Moody's put the Corporation and Cicero's credit rating under review following the technical default.

The Cicero Town Council had a line item in its budget for the Facility but did not appropriate any money for the project until after the default. Between September and December, the Corporation's rating fell from investment grade to junk status from Baa2 to Caa1 following three downgrades by the rating agency.